Our group submitted a manuscript examining the relationship between ICC change pre/post and cognitive change pre/post. We provided information about the ICC technique as noted in the original CONN manuscript, but received the following reviewer query about whether CONN ICC uses a threshold / step function:
"The authors described ICC in the supplementary material. However, a threshold (or step function u(x)) did not specify in the evaluation of ICC. Without a threshold, both positive and negative connectivity were included in the computation of ICC. However, according to R. Martuzzi et al. (2011), which developed a measure of ICC for the first time, the connectivity strength was binarized by a step function. In general, researchers compute degree (including ICC) by using the positive connectivity only."
So, does CONN ICC use a step function (positive connectivity only)? If not, are there other papers/references for ICC being used without one? Justification for not including it?
Any recommendations on how best to address this would be most appreciated.
Warm regards to all,
Jeff
"The authors described ICC in the supplementary material. However, a threshold (or step function u(x)) did not specify in the evaluation of ICC. Without a threshold, both positive and negative connectivity were included in the computation of ICC. However, according to R. Martuzzi et al. (2011), which developed a measure of ICC for the first time, the connectivity strength was binarized by a step function. In general, researchers compute degree (including ICC) by using the positive connectivity only."
So, does CONN ICC use a step function (positive connectivity only)? If not, are there other papers/references for ICC being used without one? Justification for not including it?
Any recommendations on how best to address this would be most appreciated.
Warm regards to all,
Jeff