Dear Shady,
In the toolbox you can run the ICA analysis by doing, for example:
patients > controls [1 -1] , select condition , select ICA 1
patients > controls [1 -1] , select condition , select ICA 2
patients > controls [1 -1] , select condition , select ICA 3
etc.
or you can also do:
patients > controls [1 -1], select condition , select ICA 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. (assuming I have 20 components)
In conclusion, my question is: if I want to explore the differences between ICA networks in patients and controls, which of the two approaches should I use?
I would be very grateful if you could explain me the difference between the two approaches.
I am sorry if the question is too simple. I am a student and I am trying to understand how the software works on my own.
Many thanks,
Marta
In the toolbox you can run the ICA analysis by doing, for example:
patients > controls [1 -1] , select condition , select ICA 1
patients > controls [1 -1] , select condition , select ICA 2
patients > controls [1 -1] , select condition , select ICA 3
etc.
or you can also do:
patients > controls [1 -1], select condition , select ICA 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. (assuming I have 20 components)
In conclusion, my question is: if I want to explore the differences between ICA networks in patients and controls, which of the two approaches should I use?
I would be very grateful if you could explain me the difference between the two approaches.
I am sorry if the question is too simple. I am a student and I am trying to understand how the software works on my own.
Many thanks,
Marta