Dear experts,
Now I have a resting state fMRI dataset of 8 patients using the CONN toolbox at 7T MRI scanner (MR2PAGE, isotropic of 0.7 mm; EPI, isotropic of 1.5 mm).
With its higher sensitivity to detect the neural activity, I'd like to take the advantages in both the structural and function spatial resolution.
However, I found that the segmentation toolkit implemented in CONN using the Tissue Probability Map (TMP) of SPM software which has a resolution of
1.5 * 1.5 *1.5 mm3.
So I'd like to know if somebody knows some kind of TMP with higher resolution or just using the default TMP?
If I use the default TMP, will my results of segmentation be accurate?
Could you tell me some details about the segmentation?
Thank you very much for your answers!
Have a nice day!
Best,
Shun Yao, M.D.
Research Associate
Department of Neurosurgery,
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
60 Fenwood Road, Building for Transformative Medicine 8016B
Boston, MA 02115, USA
TEL: 571-525-7772 | Email: SYAO@BWH.HARVARD.EDU
Now I have a resting state fMRI dataset of 8 patients using the CONN toolbox at 7T MRI scanner (MR2PAGE, isotropic of 0.7 mm; EPI, isotropic of 1.5 mm).
With its higher sensitivity to detect the neural activity, I'd like to take the advantages in both the structural and function spatial resolution.
However, I found that the segmentation toolkit implemented in CONN using the Tissue Probability Map (TMP) of SPM software which has a resolution of
1.5 * 1.5 *1.5 mm3.
So I'd like to know if somebody knows some kind of TMP with higher resolution or just using the default TMP?
If I use the default TMP, will my results of segmentation be accurate?
Could you tell me some details about the segmentation?
Thank you very much for your answers!
Have a nice day!
Best,
Shun Yao, M.D.
Research Associate
Department of Neurosurgery,
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
60 Fenwood Road, Building for Transformative Medicine 8016B
Boston, MA 02115, USA
TEL: 571-525-7772 | Email: SYAO@BWH.HARVARD.EDU